Sorry, this entry is only available in Dutch.
As a supervisor of PhD students, you have a lot of influence on the progression of the student. But how do you supervise your students as effectively as possible? When do you give the student room, and when do you give them more guidance? How can you efficiently supervise the writing process? And what to do when things don’t go as smoothly as hoped?
During the course Supervision of PhD students of Hertz Training for scientists, we will focus on the coaching role of the supervisor. The course largely consists of practical exercises: participants learn by carrying out assignments, receiving personal feedback and applying the lessons learn in their work situation.
Marieke has given the course Supervision of PhD students at various Dutch universities, including the TU Delft and the Radboud University.
Writing grant applications can be tough. Your readers won’t always be specialists, you have to show why your research is interesting, and you only have a limited number of words to do this. It takes a different approach and different writing skills than writing a scientific article.
During this workshop you will learn to:
- write a memorable introduction,
- involve the reader by using and interesting storyline,
- avoid common pitfalls,
- stand out from the crowd.
This half day workshop is given in cooperation with Hakuna Matata science & media.
You have reached the last obstacle before the grant you’d been hoping to get: the interview. But how do you prepare for that interview? Together with Hakuna Matata science & media we have developed a workshop to help scientists prepare for these interviews.
During the workshop we will discuss which topics you should address during the presentation, but also how you can grab your public’s attention, and defend your proposal. We will share practical tips and there is time to practice.
Since many interviews are currently taking place online, we will also discuss how to present yourself via a digital medium.
In September 2020 we gave the workshop for scientists who were preparing Vidi and ERC Consolidator interviews, but the workshop is also suitable for other categories of grant interviews.
The workshop can be given online, and lasts 3,5 hours.
Preparation for a Vidi interview:
I experienced the coaching trajectory as very insightful, not only for the preparation of the grant interview but also for more hands on tools on how to present myself better. The sessions gave me plenty of opportunity to practice my presentation and interview settings. This structure was really helpful to give me a clear picture of where we were in the process and whether I’ve been making progress. Marieke is very knowledgeable, professional, provided a lot of useful tips and tricks as well as constructive feedback.
Preparation for a Veni interview:
Marieke helped me preparing my Veni interview. With the help of a couple of colleagues, we structured and practiced the presentation, and practiced answering questions. Marieke made sure the preparations were organized smoothly, and gave constructive feedback. This made me feel comfortable, despite being nervous about the interview. She also helped with tips on how to come across during an online interview. I ended up going into the interview with the feeling that I had prepared everything I could, which gave me a lot of confidence.
Preparation for a consortium interview:
Together with my colleagues, I was invited for a funding interview as part of the Dutch Research Agenda. We asked Marieke to help us prepare this interview. This turned out to be a good choice. To summarize: during the two mock interviews we weren’t able to communicate in a clear and concise way with the practice jury. During the real interview, we did succeed.
What worked very well was gathering questions during the practice sessions. During a third session, we formulated strategies to answer the questions we deemed important together with Marieke. We did this without loosing the spontaneity during the real interview.
Without the practice sessions, I don’t think the interview would have gone well. Now it did, and our proposal was funded. I don’t like preparing interviews, but this was useful.